Michael_13

Just watch the comparison between 5d and Blackmagic (available on the web) and you'll see that G6 will not have much of a chance.

The Blackmagic's sensor is purpose built, while that of G6 is an...

@Nishi: No, they are not better suited for FF, because they were designed to fit film and not digital sensors. The latter makes them lose sharpness and light in the corners. A 4/3 design crops the...

Just imagine that you had a bunch of Zeiss or Leica lenses worth several thousand Euros. With this adapter you may be able to make good use of them again - without losing their focal length and...

Just imagine that you had a bunch of Zeiss or Leica lenses worth several thousand Euros. With this adapter you'd be able to make good use of them again - without losing their focal length and even...

And you really think there's no saturation setting in this camera?

Ad a proper zoom to the equation, put the system on a scale and you know the advantage of 4/3.

If you only use the kit lens and have large hands, a bigger body can be better, of course.

You're lucky that you've found the right system that fits your needs and your taste. Personally, I never liked Canons color rendering much and prefer Olympus and Nikon.
Today's technical standards...

Excellent lens, but the JPGs are not doing it justice.

The RAWs however, are also quite misleading as I found:
- strong moiré patterns on the money bills make Nikon A look worse
- stronger...

@Imagefoundry:
I don't like/use LR either, but it is very widely spread.
Besides: DPR offers RAWs for download, so you can do your own comparisons with your preferred software.

@GeorgeZ:
The lens is certainly more expensive than a kit version: Better quality and lower quantity.
Look at the prices of excellent primes: 500€ and more are not unusual.
If you know how prices...

Wrong impression. You need to read the whole review.

@Pablo:
Wrong impression. You need to read the whole review. A simple RAW comparison cannot tell the truth about the true performance.

@santa:
Why don't you look further? Fujifilm offers even better models with RAW.

@sarit:
Yes, you can put this Sigma on a Nikon 1 with the 1-inch sensor, but will lose wide angle.

Just like Frances wrote: The 10x zoom for Nikon 1 is a good measure. Pulling it up to 30x with...

Great photo! I like the color contrast and the reflection of its "face".

Problem is, the laws of optics don't like what you like.
If you need 1" superzoom you can buy Nikon 1.

Yes, excellent detail, but I guess the sensor only plays a minor role in this particular picture:
The strong light an the excellent lens make it happen.

Very likely so, because I don't assume that Nikon found a way to circumvent the law of physics. :-)

Yes, and a huge pain once this thing gets a bit bent or dented.
I prefer more sturdy protection.

Great sharpness and no visible noise, but one thing bothers me:

Skin colors. Especially lips look very artificial to me.
So far I've only known this problem from Panasonic.