the zoom feature seems a bit obvious. But then I realised Instagram can't zoom at all.
This is the most interesting news I've seen here in years.
rishi o': Apple's biggest mistake here is not clarifying if Photos will have an equivalent or greater feature set as Aperture so we can know how to move forward. The whole statement about photographers being able to store all their photos on iCloud is extremely ignorant. How do I feel about it all? How many cuss words are allowed on this forum?
Marketing announcements are never vague by accident. They didn't clarify because the answer will be no. Just like the switch to Apple Maps or Final Cut Pro X, it will be half-assed for them, and painful for users.
rfclark: One reason this didn't crash and burn like a lot of our early military test rockets is that this rocket is built with private money!The engineers made sure they knew what they were doing before they lit the fuse!
Some Soviets were imprisoned when they were perceived to have screwed up. In many cases, their friends & colleagues were killed by failed launches. There was plenty of incentive.
Your premise you can't be fired from a public sector job for screwing up is also completely false. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Rawmeister: Hard to believe anybody would shoot anything with film.Oh well - some people still listen to vinyl on turntables too.People will be people.
I've had a lot of fun with film, and it has improved my skills a lot, skills I can apply to digital.
Anyone serious about improving their digital photography should own a film camera and take it out now and then.
Cheng Bao: Since when digital photography review drops 'digital' from name?
It is digital, just the digital part (the scanner) is sold separately.
A real innovation would be automatic lens caps like many compacts have, but I guess it's kind of complicated to do.
Lonnie Janzen: or... You could just put it in your pocket.
hey, don't let the hipsters ruin skinny jeans for the rest of us. the pockets on them work just fine :-)
Gesture: Real photogs don't use UV filters, lens caps, neck straps or wrist straps. They do use lens hoods.
Real photographers don't use cameras. They merely observe the scene then vomit a perfect reconstruction directly onto high quality paper.
sh10453: So many innocent lives have been lost, so many widows, so many orphans, so many destroyed homes, ...
The more killing, and the more destruction, the more profits for our (civilized) Western weapons manufacturers, and the more ego satisfaction to our corrupt politicians.
Photojournalism in war zones is an extremely dangerous business, but it brings to us the sad and ugly face of war.
What a sad ending for this woman!!
May all of those who innocently lost their lives be resting in peace.
Both sides really need some visionary leaders who can see above this primitive tit-for-tat attitude and begin to focus on giving and generating good will.
ybizzle: This is truly an act of robbery. Samsung stole the Fuji XF-1 design and made into an interchangeable lens mount. What they couldn't steal was the feeling of holding a magnificent photographic tool with a manual zoom twist lens. The XF-1 along with higher end X cameras take us back to pure photography. Think Leica M6 Titanium if you have the tan XF-1. Truly a masterpiece in design with image quality to match!
It's not really that similar to XF-1. Mainly the trim, which are both inspired by film-era cameras.
Peter Bendheim: I can't help it but I have a strong dislike for Samsung - they are the copycats of the tech world - copied the iPad, iPhone, and they have a camera that is remarkably similar to the NEX range. Now a knock off of the Panasonic GM1..They might make ok household appliances, but I'm sure never going to trust my picture taking experiences to them.Design thieves, that's for sure.
If you're talking styling, it does appear NEX like. But let's also not forget the Samsung NX pre-dates the Sony NEX, and Samsung was the first to do mirrorless APS-C.
67gtonr: The M is Considerably larger than the GM1 in only one aspect and that is sensor size, and this M2 is even smaller than the M!
in terms of body:sensor size it might be better.
looool. Stop this Hasselblad stuff. I'm still recovering from seeing the looney at an expo.
DPR: Would be nice to include the 2/3" and 1" sensor sizes in the camera feature search (: (:
fabiofirenze0104: It's a really lovely image.But I'm not sure it is a photograph.
All the manipulation was only working around technical limitations of the equipment. The end result is what a future camera would produce automatically, so yes, it's a photograph.
DylanHoen: As an engineer that likes to tinker with things, they added almost everything that I would have wished for.In sensor phase detect for old 4/3rds lenses.GPS image tagging - through cell phone, which gets around the GPS battery hog problem by using the phone's battery.Remote control with image preview on a cell phone.Automated multi-shot HDR built in.One other wish that I've has for a while is open source firmware, but they put together such a well rounded product that I have almost run out of ideas for firmware modifications. Pretty much the only idea I have left is automated focus stacked macro.The lens looks nice, too. 12-60 would have been nice but after you factor in the laws of physics, this was probably the better compromise.This looks like the uncompromised upgrade to my E-510 that I have been waiting for.The price, well, if you compare the feature set to what else is on the marked, it is technically a good deal, but not one I can afford to jump on at this time.
I love the idea of focus stacked macros!
Sergey Borachev: Olympus made good on what they promised about 18 months ago, i.e. the OM-D being "The Beginning of The New".
This is the second OM-D model and another breakthrough, and this is significant, merging the pro grade 43 into M43 and adding all those high grade 43 lenses to the great lens system for M43. The new features are significant for those who need to get the very best in a mirrorless. Bravo!
All it needs to do is ensure there are no QC issues.
I think it's worth clarifying that with native lenses, mirrorless still photography is very competitive with DSLR for focus speed. The weaknesses are in continuous AF and also legacy lenses.
thx1138: Wow, all awesome except for one thing, they kept that woeful battery from the E-M5. Why is it that I can 3x the battery life from my 5D III battery yet is is maybe 50% larger.
Anyhow, looks like I'll be upgrading form the E-M5 in the next 12 months. New 12-40 f/2.8 looks good and I only recently bought the 12-35 f/2.8 from Panasonic, not that's there's anything worng with it, but I'd have preferred the longer range. Looks like I'll get the 40-150 f/2.8 however and with my 45 f/1.8 that'll be all the three lenses I need.
Live view is always going to use more battery, but I agree it should have improved on the em5, which is not even good by mirrorless standards. 5-axis IBIS and wifi would play a part too.
KariIceland: FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS?! I am better off getting the damn Sony RX 100 for this price than buy this module!
Did you overlook the $250 version?