They donhave that awesome 65mm macro though
Well you can acheive most of that wish list if it were just f1.8
Nikon did a similar thing with their 18-300.Chop the max aperture a bit to reduce weight. Prpbably a decent trade off with vc added l. Less weight is always welcome
Yes its getting like that but for most people shooting in decent lighting the current system of iso is adequate. Iso 12800 has not been a widespread option until recently
Thats all you need for vid resolution.
Maybe for the D7xxx
Its an ilc module, not a whole unit. Lens is optional
Medium format should always be more expensive. It requires more of everything to make and since its never meant to be a consumer tool (kind of like how you can aucker consumers into buying a eg....
If Ts & co. Emplyed the photographer directly it would be a different story?
Your loss (before and after).
More trolling? Lets write the dony stuff off as unfortunate but the company does deserve kudos.
Trololololo? Go pro ilc? IQ matters? What?
Reminds me of miyazakis perar lenses. Is it rangefinder coupled?
Mmm Dpreview... want to ceedut Ken Rockwell with the find for both the ebay lens and the cacanon in BH? I doubt both DPR and KR would decide to contrast these lenses at the same time. Very...
Woops wro g type of rotator.. sozz.
You mean the shift and tilt lenses... umm hartblei and arax much?
I dont care that your trolling, this comment is jusy annoying either way
Can we qualify uniquely in its class for stabilization? Nikon and canon both offer wide zooms with VC. Do you mean being 1mm shorter than Nikon/Canon lenses or the fact its a 2.8 zoom?given it...