HowaboutRAW:Samsung have nothing close to the GR's lens.
Samsung have nothing close to the GR's lens.
Have you used a GR? Anyway you said better and faster as two separate things, it may be faster, but the Leica will be amazingly good if it is just as good as the Ricoh.
Geez a lot of complaints / comparisons by the specsperts on the new X, to me it looks like a darn fine camera and probably the first Leica X I would consider buying, considering the following...
A 'better' lens? Are you sure about that? Faster yes.
Ricoh GR, Coolpix A, X100/S/T, DP1/2/3 and R1.
Canon, Nikon and Sony in this range are all around $600+
Uhm, there is not a single 'mirrorless' camera lens I can think of that doesn't have a filter thread. I suspect you are thinking 'compact camera'.
Yes, they are secretly making 56mm f1.2 medium format lenses for $1000. Well wishful thinking never hurt I guess.
I see you have managed to find the preproduction / mock up lenses at photokina... well at least for Fuji.
And DPR staff are 'normal' general public visitors are they?
Agree with everybody above. No mention of the A77 II in the 7D II write up even though in reality it is the newest of the competition and on specs at least the closest. But nope, nothing, zip....
Still no word, despite visiting and reporting on the Sony booth, from DPR about the prototype lenses announced and previewed at photokina? No I supposed that would go against what DPR believe in.
For people who don't like X-Trans?
Takes the EVF from the Leica T.
QX1 you can put any lens you like on there.
And Fuji have what in the way of a Macro? Repeating the same mistakes over and over. Sony already have an 85mm for the crop cameras, just like Fuji do. This is full frame and has been out less than...
None have an UWA zoom with an aperture faster than f4 at all, let alone in equivalence.
I already have an 85mm f1.4 for my A7S. New 35mm f1.4 looks interesting, but think ultimately will go with the 28mm f2, mostly to also use as a 21mm f2 and 16mm f2 Fisheye.