By Gerard JP : I am opposing RE : "ADOBE is happy to get a rid of hobbies and semi profi istockers, who buy once, do not upggrade for 5 years, do not need new features, use 30% of PS potential, do...
Sorry to oppose your comment but pro’s do NOT need some gimmicks like “shake-filter” etc. Pro-photographers are after image which comes from camera not Photoshop. Pro-photographers rules by saying...
"So you are spending $200k on equipment" ... I rent but mostly I prefer to buy. It depends on business proposition. It is always 100% about $$$. $200 Thousand is not to much if you consider...
"So you are spending $200k on equipment" ... I rent but mostly I prefer to buy. It depends on business proposition. It is always 100% about $$$. $200 Thousand is not to much if you consider...
Running commercial photo studio comes to $20 000.00/year + plus + expenses in total of approximately $40-50 000.00 a year. Not mentioning that I own it means $750 000.00 investment in property...
Running commercial photo studio comes to $20 000.00/year + plus + expenses in total of approximately $50 000.00 a year. Not mentioning that I own it means $750 000.00 investment in property another...
Ha ... Ha .... Ha ... you are very, very funny ! Massive saving ? Where ... saving for what. For few useless features ? Give me a break pal. I just come back to studio from Starbuck talking to few...
Btw, why under this sun average photographer need a feature of Photoshop like 3D is a million dollar question to me ... If they have in many cases no idea what is ... And how to use it.