tom sugnet

Bokeh seems nicer on the Canon:
http://lcap.tistory.com/entry/APO-Sonnar-135mm-f2-Review

Bokeh seems nicer on the Canon.

expensive

That's a 28-55 f/2.8 lens in FFeq terms (except for shutter speed/exposure)
For a cropper, this pricey lens would be acceptable if it had stabilization, which it doesn't.

Sizzling

To many people these will be perfect sleeping glasses.
Aliens and other intruders don't like cameras ;)

boring

I have an S3, so I will be waiting for an S5.
Would love to see a 6 inch screen.

boring

Nikkor 28 f/1.8 AF-S has better bokeh, and is cheaper.

Very appealing

I love my S3

I have this camera and the pictures look soft even after you've taken them (when previewed on screen). I guess the effective resolution is around 4 megapixels (due to strong NR), it's much much...

I have this phone and pictures look soft even after you've taken them (when previewed on screen). I guess the effective resolution is around 4 megapixels (due to strong NR), it's much much softer...

my Samsung Galaxy SIII is much better ;)

focus recompose sucks

Samsung Galaxy S III owns it

good luck

It's too expensive for me,
I think I will be getting JVC's GY-HMQ10 instead :(

at last