It doesn't surprise me at all. People are used to Nikon interface en jpeg's so they punish the Pentax for not being a Nikon. Catch 22.
My point was that the FZ1000 is not a compact camera. The idea that smaller is better, has nothing to do with photography. Only with comfort.
It's not a grip it's a AA-battery holder you can fit inside the camera. Doesn't ad to the size. Maybe a little more weight.
I am not, but it is in the round up and it's being called a compact while dslr's are always getting flak for being bulky. :p
I won't be using those lenses on a dslr.
When you use the battery holder and eneloops you can get double the shot's out of the K-50.
The K-50 is actually a reclad K-30 which is based roughly on the K-5 with the image processor of the K-01. You could say it's a 2010 camera, but it still rocks.
None of these camera's are very compact, but the FZ1000 certainly not. It is bigger than most entry and mid range dslrs, and even than some enthusiast dslrs (like the K-3)
II stellar for me
Apparently Flickr shows the option when you are logged in (even though it's labeled NC) They expect me to order my own pics from them it seems.
It's different because flickr is making money from it. $30 for a eight by ten inch. I think this is in violation of CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
who needs lenses. You can adapt so much to it.
Did they 3-dprint that body? Those lenses don't seem to have enough angle of view to create a 360 dome (like the Ricoh Theta).
That's what you get for not giving it a Gold award dpreview. Now the design team has gone bonkers. But hey at least it isn't a gangsta version like the Brikk's
When I buy a 360-degree 3d television I'll think aboot it.
It's not a lot bigger than a Nikon D4 or Canon 1Dx It has less height. Just more depth because of the registry distance. It has a great grip. For landscape photographers this will be a great camera...
It doesn't matter. There are plenty of other camera's out there.
Pentaxforums does not agree. It rates both older sigma's better. http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-sigma-17-70mm-comparison/conclusion-ratings.htmlThis fixation with corner sharpness at...
Pentaxforums does not agree. It rates both older sigma's better. http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-sigma-17-70mm-comparison/conclusion-ratings.html
This fixation with corner sharpness at...
Photozone didn't test de 17-70/2.8-4 on Pentax but the previous model 2.8-4.5. They did test it on the Nikon D7000 where it scores very well....
bold statement. Do you mean the overpriced http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Nikon/AF-S-DX-Zoom-Nikkor-17-55mm-f-2.8G-IF-ED