It doesn't kill the concept at all, it's simply one of the limitations of the engineering but that doesn't mean that the body suddenly loses its mirrorless characteristics for every other lens the...
Lol, you people are really quite challenged when it comes to 'reading between the lines'.
I just bought a Nexus 5 for $400 aud from the Google Play store, anticipating the imminent announcement (and possibly end of sales of the Nexus 5) of the Nexus 6. The Nexus 6 should retail for $700...
Let's not encourage tablet photographers. People can't stand that crap obstructing their view.
USB 2.0 only for you, Sir.
Someone's upset... lol - so pretentious.
I'd call it the budget (his only-way) to travel.
90mm equivalent is where it's at.
They were welcome to submit entries, but clearly didn't. And who let you be the judge?
They do speak for themselves. That's why they won. That's why they are here for your viewing displeasure.
OMG the extreme corners are slightly blurred, damn centre-sharpness-across-97%-of-the-frame compromises! Nobody will buy this try-hard toy! Only soccer mums and noobs!
It's got a sony sensor too.
Yes, a Canon that was infinitely good would only approach 0 lol.
Matewka, you wouldn't be saying a Canon is infinitesimally good would you?
Divide by 0.
X-100T and X-30 were just plain disappointing. Shame on those silly rumorists for giving us high hopes!
Bananasplit either means his 7D has rubbish noise performance or the LX100 has excellent noise performance comparable to an APS-C-sensor camera.
It's probably the rubbish screen you're viewing them on. I thought the high ISO samples were really quite good!