For a better spec'd sensor, just pick up a m43, or hope that Panasonic doesn't trump this a mile and a half with a fixed lens m43 compact, that would indeed probably be smaller than this...
AF =/= modern. It's simply another compromise of lens design.
Lol! Well played. ;)
Pretty sure my Nokia with its 41MP camera can do a lot better.
Plastic cracks though. Another benefit however must be expansion and contraction coefficients. I have no idea how these are mitigated in an all-metal mechanical lens. One just has to assume the...
...Communism... is that you?
I find your expression well intentioned and quite disturbing.
The multi lens bokeh is the death of this.
Just get the biggest and best gear and you'll never need to wonder about it again!
He posted it on Reddit, only one of the most cringeworthy communities on the internet (dpreview commenters take a close second, though at least they don't steal your images).
You say it's nice now... I'd bet basic web design principles would disagree.
So blame the PR relations at Pentax for opting not to inform the DPreview editors.
$1.85? It must be a Hasselblad at that price!
$322 is a mid level price? Damn. And it has specs high enough to run the homepage without lag? Impressed!
"is good enough for me." And you really have to ask who wants 4K?
m4/3 sensor = 4/3 sensor
You're living in the past.
Yada Yada Yada...
I think the fact we built a clock just to indicate how close we are to exterminating ourselves, and the fact we managed not to (at the height of the Cold War), says a lot about the human limit....