Joni...: Usually DPReviews choices of this kind of news are not great examples of good photography, always open to discussion and I think that's the main reason they post it. And that's why I never comment on them.But seeing comments from people that don't see any beauty in pictures like 1 or 9, I need to say: You guys should rethink why you photograph and what is photography...
Joni: Everyone's taste is different; but your taste isn't any more important than anyone else's.
People can love all of the images, they can hate all of them; but I don't think anyone who's been critical of some of the images should have to rethink anything. At least they're thinking...
MediaDigitalVideo: Great idea that mobile device as viewer.
If it had a *tablet* holder I could see an advantage; having a significantly bigger screen attached would be nice, but an iPhone holder... Yay, I get to replace a small screen with an almost as small screen but with extra lag.
I'd have thought a cup holder would be more useful than an iPhone holder ;)
Lan: Surprisingly high levels of noise, and worse still there's quite a lot of noise reduction at base ISO here too. For a camera with professional pretentions this is not looking good at all...
Thank you; I'm aware of that; but RAW or JPEG doesn't really matter in this case. My point was that there's noise where there shouldn't be any, and NR where it shouldn't need to be any...
Surprisingly high levels of noise, and worse still there's quite a lot of noise reduction at base ISO here too. For a camera with professional pretentions this is not looking good at all...
MadManAce: Best DXO upgrade yet! About time that I can fully use DNG files, I have been trying trials for sometime and the sharpening artifacts, DNG incompatibility, slow processing, not impressive noise reduction (including PRIME), and many others things have been addressed. I may actually buy it this time, unless I am forced to get the elite version to use with my E-M1, if that is the case, then I will skip again.
Ironically I suspect the reason you've been having NR problems is almost certainly *because* you're using DNG. I don't know what camera you're using, or how you're creating the DNG files, but many DNG files are demosaiced. PRIME's unlikely to work well on those.
I find PRIME works spectacularly on my 5D2's CR2 files - sufficiently so that I bought a copy of DxO9! It's far better than ACR, DPP, NoiseNinja, NeatImage or indeed anything else I've tried...
One thing you may (or may not) have missed is that DxO rather stupidly (IMO) defaults to not using PRIME. You need to specifically select it in the Customize options; otherwise DxO defaults to "HighQuality" noise reduction; which isn't high quality ;)
Lan: I know I'm swimming against the tide here, but I can't understand why anyone would buy a camera because it's small, and then deliberately go and make it bigger?!?
Use two hands to hold the camera (any camera) and the grip problem is solved. You don't need to buy a grip, you need to get a grip ;)
Richard: A good question. To be honest I don't know. I don't tend to use these cameras in my pockets; as I feel the lens mechanism is too flimsy for that... I think cameras like the S100 are a bit too big for my pockets already!
Mike FL: "Lytro Development Kit features a 41MP Toshiba sensor". It is interesting to see Toshiba is joining the game of sensor war.
It's almost certainly the same Toshiba 41MP sensor that was in the Nokia Pureview 808. Not new in other words ;)
If they are looking for a hardware partner, Nokia should be familiar with that particular sensor!
KonstRuctor: And what about Canon sRAW and mRAW?
Actually a bit of both :)
I know I'm swimming against the tide here, but I can't understand why anyone would buy a camera because it's small, and then deliberately go and make it bigger?!?
Lebkuchen: How can I get "Olympus colours" while processing images with DXO? Any hint?
Possibly by using an Olympus Camera Profile in the Color Rendering section. I don't have an Olympus camera, so I can't comment on the accuracy of the profile though...
Or "not RAW" as they're correctly known...
The best part of DxO 9 IMO was the PRIME noise reduction, and that isn't available when you shoot sRAW/mRAW because they're not actually RAW files.
Cards are cheap. Storage is cheap. Why are you using sRAW or mRAW?
massimogori: Yes, amazing... example of journalism. Which Natural History museum? Imagine a newspaper writing an article about the murder of "John" rather than "Kennedy".
The one in London is branded the Natural History Museum:http://www.nhm.ac.uk/It has nothing to do with cultural imperialism, at least not mine ;)
For those of us in England, it's obvious which museum it is, it's the Natural History Museum :)
For those of you from elsewhere, it's in London, England...
Jostian: Pricey... and this obsession with LED flashes, Xenon is the only way to go if a company is serious about the photographic capabilities of their phones! and Xenon is tougher on battery but seriously its not like you use the flash the whole day, come on Android, get serious with photography on your phones, give us a flash not a light!
Jostian; tricky because almost all the LEDs people are using now are being used in continuous rather than flash mode. Very few people are using decent LEDs as true "flashes".
In reality a bare LED die should be very similar in speed terms to a LASER which people use to provide millions of flashes per second - albeit at far lower power.
The only slight fly in the ointment for most white LEDs is that they're usually blue/UV chips with a white emitting phosphor - and that phosphor is going to be the limiting factor for most LED flash performance - in speed terms.
If I get some spare time, I'll have a play and see what I can put together. No promises though. I always seem to have more things to do than time to do them in... Also don't want to splat one of my nice LEDs ;)
Decent LED flash is more than a competitor for Xenon for devices this size.
The problem is that most cameraphones don't have a decent LED flash; they usually have a cheap and therefore poor quality LED flash.
LED can freeze motion just as well as Xenon *if* the LED is driven correctly.
Disappointed; I wanted the update to require a USB dock, dock ;)
Why is a Dalek like a photographer?
Because they both like standing around targets accidentally shooting one another ;)
Lan: Please can you make the ACR conversions more apparent from the filenames?
Usually you give us IMG_0123_ACR, or IMG_0123; you haven't here (as far as I can see) so it's impossible to tell in the gallery which are ACR and which are JPEG SOOC in this set.
After looking at a couple of the JPEGs there's no point in looking at any more, as they show the excessively wide radius sharpening and excessive NR that the JPEG engine(ers) chose for all recent Canon cameras...
For those of us shooting RAW the ACR results are far more interesting (and relevant!). Please can you make them easier to locate?
LOL; that would do it! Thanks for clearing that up :)
OK, but then why do some of the shots have EXIF that says:"Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 8.6 (Macintosh)"?
7DII_beta_ISO200_030A9199 for example
Please can you make the ACR conversions more apparent from the filenames?