Hey! I got a bite!
Useless. An idea looking for a market.
Yes - it has to be hard to keep a building like that alive and there are hazards that come with the whole of that interior that I imagine are like diving boards to insurance companies. Still would...
@John - thanks for the link! I like it!
And you mistake me for someone who cares.
No, I really could care even less - but soon I can't care any less because I'll stop writing. But I have enough interest because you're spinning like a top. I've said nothing about libraries and...
No, I could care less, much less. And why do you feel the need to talk talk talk and be so serious about every subject as if you're an expert? It's so easy to spin you up like a little top.
Look at you just talk talk talking on about it. I could care less. I enjoyed the photos.
Sure, you know about everything.
It's your habit to speak of things about which you do not know. I generally assume this is happening now because it's so common place.
Oh no, it's HowAboutRaw again - making things up!
Bygone era, nostalgia at it's best.
How are we so sure Canon and Nikon will follow suit? And why would we be able to use smaller format lenses? The image circle is too small.
What? You don't have 67 lenses? Do you have a deer or a horse? Can I make myself more obvious? Because if you don't get the reference, I don't believe you are a professional landscape photographer...
Wow, I've never had 67 lenses at one time. I respect a guy that has that many lenses. Heck, if you just had 35 lenses I would be impressed. I heard about a guy one time who had 135 lenses. I didn't...
So you still have the question, but your answer is yes?