Joe Ogiba

Joe Ogiba

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jan 8, 2005

Comments

Total: 773, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: Wow, UHS-1 SD cards are so much more expensive compared to CFast cards for 4K cameras like the Canon XC10 ;)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1164632-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx256u395_ge_256gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1186716-REG/lexar_lc256crbna3600_pro_3600x_cfast_memory.html

BTW , why would anyone want to use a SDHC card in any 4K camera when SDXC cards are a dime a dozen.

That is like buying a 32GB SSD for your laptop.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 23:20 UTC

Wow, UHS-1 SD cards are so much more expensive compared to CFast cards for 4K cameras like the Canon XC10 ;)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1164632-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx256u395_ge_256gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1186716-REG/lexar_lc256crbna3600_pro_3600x_cfast_memory.html

BTW , why would anyone want to use a SDHC card in any 4K camera when SDXC cards are a dime a dozen.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 22:05 UTC as 16th comment | 5 replies

The Sony a6300 looks better at half the price.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1542/26649413086_89311db094_o.png

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 13:21 UTC as 26th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

JackM: This does seem like a good application for the technology. With a 10' screen and an HD projector at home, I can see focus errors in movies sometimes.

With 1080p HD on a 10ft screen the pixels must look huge . My last four displays were all 4K UHD.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2016 at 21:06 UTC
On article Crossing the Bridge: Canon XC10 Review (259 comments in total)

$675 256GB C Fast 2.0 cards for the XC10 compared to SDXC U3 cards for 4K 60p video cameras like the Panasonic AG-DVX200 that cost a fraction of that amount.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1131706-REG/lexar_lsd256cbnl633_lexar.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1186716-REG/lexar_lc256crbna3600_pro_3600x_cfast_memory.html

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 19:47 UTC as 59th comment | 2 replies
On article Crossing the Bridge: Canon XC10 Review (259 comments in total)
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: TheCameraStoreTV gave it the award as worst video camera of 2015 and the lens was awarded one of the top three worst lenses of 2015 !
https://youtu.be/Mexs7HvHR2I?t=1316

Are you kidding ? They have 192,308 subscribers and 29,790,184 views to their camera reviews. DPR has 34,261 subscribers and 11,651,577 views. Did you even look at their camera reviews ?

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 19:36 UTC
On article Crossing the Bridge: Canon XC10 Review (259 comments in total)
In reply to:

57even: Finally, a proper video camera that does stills.

Is that a joke ?

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 18:40 UTC
On article Crossing the Bridge: Canon XC10 Review (259 comments in total)

TheCameraStoreTV gave it the award as worst video camera of 2015 and the lens was awarded one of the top three worst lenses of 2015 !
https://youtu.be/Mexs7HvHR2I?t=1316

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 18:39 UTC as 65th comment | 11 replies
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2053 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jimmy jang Boo: Pardon me, but what's the point of a MILC if it still requires big lenses?

And speaking of native (cough) lenses...

There are many compact lenses in E mount. If you want a big camera with flipping mirror get a DSLR.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 17:22 UTC
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2053 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tiefenunschärfe: dpreview, you forgot at cons: no IBIS!

Does Canon and Nikon DSLRs have IBIS ? There are many Sony E/FE mount lenses with IS in the 10-300mm range.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 17:20 UTC
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2053 comments in total)
In reply to:

Johnnymg2: WHY no mention/measurement of rolling shutter? Rolling shutter effect might be the Achilles Heel for this cam. ???

Do you see any RS in this a6300 video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH4B_H259dk

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 23:01 UTC
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2053 comments in total)

I agree the 4K video is peerless. Here is the detail you see in a 4K UHD a6300 video shot with the FE 70-200mm @70mm ( 3840x2160 screenshot ) :
https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1489/26194262366_c54888a80d_o.png

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 19:17 UTC as 203rd comment
In reply to:

Tommix: NX1 is better.

I will compare my a6300 with my NX1 tomorrow. I have many more E and FE mount lenses .

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 21:43 UTC

Looking great ! My a6300 should be delivered tomorrow :)

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 21:42 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

The Squire: An f2.8 lens made a lot of sense in front of the 1" sensor. You got effective light gathering and DoF control that was on-par with an APSC DSLR with superzoom - With overall IQ being probably a bit better, good build quality and a more convenient package.

With this lens, the camera is back in traditional bridge-camera territory. A good bridge camera, but no longer a DSLR alternative.

Compare it to a 4K DSLR and 24-600mm eqiv zoom lenses. The RX10 III #1 feature is 25x zoom for 4K UHD video. If you just want to shoot stills get the A7 or a DSLR.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 21:07 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

vermaden: Version III of RX10 and still no bounce flash like in RX100I/II/III/IV? :(

If you want the RX100 then get it but why would you want a built-in bounce flash on a superzoom camera with 24-600mm eqiv lens ? BTW the RX10 III would work great with my Sony HVL-F60M bounce flash if needed so that is why Sony did that.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 12:46 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

mosc: now that we have the speed graph, I still prefer the RX10m2's lens to the RX10m3's. Reach is overrated and it's a stop slower through most of the zoom range. The f2.4 is nice at 24mm which I do shoot a lot at but even at 28 it's slower.

Right, anyone with a lens over 200mm is a perv spying on his neighbor. It's amazing on the amount of retarded posts here.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 12:41 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom1234567: Same crap 1inch sensor IQ is. Not g.ood at all
if I buy an all in one camera
I want one with a decent sensor
And I want decent images

Get the A7r II with 24-240mm zoom if you want a 42mp full frame sensor and all in one zoom.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 12:24 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

mosc: now that we have the speed graph, I still prefer the RX10m2's lens to the RX10m3's. Reach is overrated and it's a stop slower through most of the zoom range. The f2.4 is nice at 24mm which I do shoot a lot at but even at 28 it's slower.

Reach is overrated ? Tell that to anyone wanting more than 200mm . This 24-600mm F2.4-4 lens is the fastest of all superzoom lenses. BTW Sony is keeping the RX10 II in the lineup for people that don't care for long FL zooms.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 12:20 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

LF Photography: Although it seems like a powerful compact, it's high price and size place it in DSLR/Mirorless territory. Call me crazy, but I'd rather get a FF DSLR such as the K-1 for the ultimate in stills IQ and ruggedness. Video specs are nice, though.

How much is the K-1 with 24-600mm zoom ? Does it shoot 4K UHD ? Yes, you are crazy.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 12:13 UTC
Total: 773, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »