disasterpiece

I'm kind of sorry that I didn't wait for D7100 when I bought a D7000 four months ago, but then again, the differences are not huge. Also, I tend to disagree with the hint that there will be D7000...

It has the weight of 3 or 4 prime lenses, but I suspect it may have the price of more than that number of primes.

I was hoping for some functional updates to the D7000 - if I had the 800 f/5.6, I probably wouldn't be shooting a D7000.

I wouldn't dare doing this to my camera, but anyway, great shot!

No, but I don't need one either :D

Thanks, but I'll stick with Nikon.

D90 wouldn't be bad if you have good glass for it.

Not that's it's bad, but nothing really shocking to drive me away from my D7000. This is just the expected update to a more-than-two year old model. I guess I'll be buying more glass, then moving...

Isn't the AF way too limited considering the lack of controls for it? I guess you have to dig in the info screen to change from AF-S to AF-C, right?

I bet Samsung would do this using a front display :P

I don't see almost anything from the guy's eyes.

I don't see anything from the guy's eyes.

This won't bother too many of us, will it? :P

Go shoot with your iPhone then...

Placed 165^th in the challenge.

Actually nothing in the rules states that you must have used a Leica...

K-30's lower price is, I think, just a result of Pentax' smaller market share. In this way of thought, Nikon and Canon are, in a way, with more freedom to make whatever they want and sell it at...

For the price of the D5200, you'd buy an FX sensor. Plus some circuitry.

I get your point, but the Leica is 7 times more expensive and yet, I think, not 7 times the quality you'd get from a D800.

Yeah. D800 anyone?