Yes, if you can afford $1700 plus the cost of good lenses. But most families don't spent that much on a camera. "$500 plus" modern cameras are general good and capable. The picture quality is...
This is not the camera for the mass at $1700. Value of camera is for somebody want high quality video/still hybrid at the lowest prices for the category.
Canon will get hammed
Canon will get hammered
a lot smoke.
a lot of smoke.
Netflix, I will do your next feature film for free.
don't complain about the price. The lens is worth that much.
don't complain about the price. The lens is worth that much. The sensor is more than 4 times of LX7. It's really a different class of camera. Should be compared to other MFT cameras.
I saw some so-called photographers chasing animals around in the National parks. I can understand the requirement of the permits
I saw some overly aggressive photographers chasing animals around in the National parks. I can understand the requirement of the permits
JPEG quality is based on individual perception. You can always shoot raw.
Google Chromebook Pixel cost $1300 with 32GB storage.
slow zooming is good for video.
Actually, there is a small flash bundled with the camera (see picture 10).
I think they will sell a compatible compact flash.
The lens on this camera is worth a lot money, and very compact for the aperture and zoom range.
you only think about Canon products, there are a lot more cameras to choose from.
Pro in 2014 should use better tools and interface than 2009. "The same interface is better" argument is silly.