To continue loving video games, their programming while doing & improving my professional photography, punish the guilty, reward the good, educate kids and fight for all that is good. :-)
If I was a Pro Landscape Photographer, as in selling big prints, etc. of landscapes and having a nice cash flow I would totally go for this.
I tried the first camera before this one and it is quite amazing. Pentax has a long history of medium format 645 film series, and this one supports all those lenses too.
fortwodriver: <sarcasm>Great, now we have a camera that takes photos in practical darkness. Here come the thousands and thousands of flickr entries showing dark rooms, dark corners, and general darkness without any attention to lighting technique. Why? Because you can now do that, and it will be good because those photographers will call themselves "pro".</sarcasm>
Yes because the average flickered/flickerette has so much disposable income as to buy a $2k+ camera with a $600+ lens.
km25: Big deal. Frist it is a movie, that is impressive, but for stills? Second the lens on adapter is F2.8. Just think a lens that is F1.2 would use iso 105k. Where would tht put a D4s. 12MPs has been past up years ago, a specially in FF. In APS-C and M43 we know of the two cameras their. It woud have served Sony much better to have cut the MP of the 36MP sensor in half for 4k movies with 18MP. Like the D4s Nikon and Canon camera. This super low light is a one trick pony, after you do some real low light stuff, then comes what. No lens and narrow use, Sony do you think before you leap?
Yes, you know much better than Sony engineers and the potential for photographers/videographers.
peevee1: It would be hard to sell it in the USA for $700 (or whatever they want in other countries?) when Oly E-PM2 goes for $249 with kit lens.
It all depends what you want as a photographer. The J4 has an auto focus the EPM2 can only dream about. And the EPM2 makes a clicky noise by the shutter while the J4 has pure silence. The video capabilities of the J4 are also better.
Not saying the EPM2 is bad or a bad deal, but it's hardly the slam dunk you propose.
beavertown: NX Mini will sell like a hot cake comparing to this J crap.
You are not making much sense here Scottelly other than Samsung has come out with some cool models. Ask yourself for a start what sensor you think the NX Mini has?
And Sony not innovating? Oh please. What leading sensor manufacturer is being used more and more with excellent Dxomarks?
And sorry- but Apple doesn't do what? You think more processors is automatically an innovation? Man.
Master Yoda: First, the new Canon M and now this new Nikon 1 . . . both "NOT FOR SALE IN THE USA". Personally, I wouldn't buy either one but it would seem they are waiving the white flag with the USA with these kind of cameras and probably doing us a favor LOL. Meanwhile, Fuji, Oly and Panny continue to move forward.
Mark- I was being sarcastic. Look at how many nationalities are around in these forums. So yes, I can totally argue with that. In fact, looking around in the forum proves your point wrong.
Scottelly: What's the point? The Nikon 1 system is a dog. Nikon has allowed it to languish, not offering a decent range of lenses. Even though they've had years to develop a half-dozen new lenses for this system, they have not done so. Why? Because they really don't give a rat's ass about the Nikon 1 system. People who buy this camera are ignorant. It's a stupid system to buy into. If Nikon had treated it more seriously, I would not be saying this, but they have made a toy, and that's basically the way I see it, because that is the way they seem to see it too.
So sad. It COULD have been a cool thing. It looked promising at first. The small (but large) sensor means that excellent lenses could be made for this system at a fraction of the price of full-frame lenses, and significantly cheaper than the lenses made for APS-C system lenses. But Nikon hasn't done it. They have dropped the ball.
While I would agree that Nikon could have had a better vision for the system, I don't think the system can be called "a dog." And the lenses keep coming so.. I mean, it took a while also for m4/3rds - Fuji is really the only recent company that came out of zero to a lot of lenses pretty fast.
As for people who buy being ignorant, I am going to have to disagree with such market statement. I am looking into the system now because m4/3rds does not offer what I would like at the moment.
Nukunukoo: 1 inch sensor. Not even BSI. If Nikon REALLY wanted the mirrorless to take off, they should have taken a page off Sony's RX10: Full frame video capture and uncompressed video over HDMI. The movie making enthusiast market is GROWING, but alas, the execs are clueless again. The only saving faith would be this mythical D9300... I'm happy with my D600 and D7100 but that does not mean I'm happy with their direction...
The Nikon 1 system supports movie taking reasonably well. What you mention is not the real issue with this system.
binauralbeats: Interesting Canikon are not even making an attempt at competing in the US. I guess they know their mirrorless offerings are subpar.
That doesn't make sense. The V3 is announced to sell here.
bgbs: Nikon 1 failure. It's simple, if you cannot sell it in the USA you've failed.
Anthony - there are many logical counterpoints to his, but what you say makes absolutely no sense. If it was for that Nikon wouldn't even be selling the V3 here.
Simply put the J1/J2/j3 didn't sell as well as Nikon hoped and there's an inventory surplus. Has nothing to do with return policies.
RichRMA: Banks, upset at business malfeasance. That's a good one, since we just went through a near-depression thanks to their "flamboyant" business practices.
So it completely justifies further fraud by a capitalist company. Right?
Just a Photographer: "SPEEDY PERFORMANCE, SOLID BODY, AND WINNING LOOKS"
That's for the consumer to decide, not the marketing department!I'll think they are way wrong. Its not a sports camera, nor does it have enough appeal to be a winner in the mirrorless section.
Have you actually tried aven a j1? Te autofocus is absurdly dslr pro class fast and that was the first version of the system
Yes Mark because as we all know the dpreview forums, only the gear heads are 100% USA born citizens....
This could have been a hit depending on price (USA). Nikon must be sitting in a pile of unsold J1/J2/J3's here.
Random Asian Guy: A lot of my photos are from low light situations, So this camera interests me quite a bit.
But I'm surprised it can only manage 5 fps for stills with only 12 megapixels.
What SLt light hit? No such thing in this model. There's noLight loss
Dimit: Sony does it properly:E mount Full frame-small form factor for both body and lens BUT less bright zooms & primes..one can't have it all,right?lA7 -general purpose.A7R -high resolution,fine for cropping.landscape stills.A7S -Low light capability (hence low resolution),FF 4k video for the non pros.Next step:2nd gen. of the above will be fine in respect of shutter behavior,burst rates,af,4k internal ( there will be with the new gen. cards),etc,etc..For the time being: A6000,A7R and RX10 fulfills the 99% of the requirements.LET'S FACE IT,WE WILL ALWAYS NEED TO UPGRADE,THAT'S HOW IT WORKS!
Speak for yourself - on the "always need to upgrade"
samhain: Glad Pentax/Ricoh are focused on important releases like limited edition 1/1.7" sensor camera kits & purses, rather than wasting time on gimmicky products like FF cameras, fast lenses, and other tools for professionals...
Yeah because they are not working on the successor of the 645 medium format camera, or they just haven't released a K-3 with dual SD card slots :-)
beavertown: Pentax Q sensor scores 47,
Q10 Scores 49,
It is likely Q7 will score 51,
Why do I take the V3 over the Q7 while V3 scores only 52 and charged triple?
First of all you can get a Q7 for much cheaper than the Nikon 1 V3. 2nd the kit they are selling you here is the entire system in one bag and a few goodies. How much is that Nikon 1 V3 with all the lenses and goodies? Do the math.
It's really two different systems, and each has its pros and cons.
Doug Janis: The market's worst selling mirrorless system with the lowest IQ.
Must be why it has outsold a few Panasonic/Olympus/other mirror less models in Japan/Asia. :-)