mobile photography technology, culture and community
www.dpreview.com

Smartphone film scanner transfers negatives to mobile

16
The Lomography Smartphone Film Scanner uses a smartphone to scan 35mm film.

How can you one-up your lomography-filter-loving smartphone photographer friends? By using real film, of course. 

The Lomography Smartphone Film Scanner lets smartphones of nearly all shapes and sizes capture clear photos of 35mm film. With your phone fit to the top of the device, you'll line up the camera to a viewfinder so it can snap photos of the back-illuminated film. The battery-powered device pairs with a free iOS or Android app that will automatically invert the film — allowing you to adjust the color and exposure before you capture the image. (Though an official Windows Phone 8 app is not currently available, an app like Photo Hub might be able to do the trick.)

Available through Photojojo for $59, the scanner works with color negatives or black & white film. It claims to handle slide film as well, though it doesn't look like it could easily accomodate the matted square slides of old as the device appears to work by advancing 35mm size film through the bottom. Individually scanned images can be combined to create panoramas or movies. The quality of the scanned images is limited to that of the smartphone sensor used to capture the photos.

Check out the Lomography Smartphone Film Scanner in action:

Comments

Total comments: 16
chandrasekaran
By chandrasekaran (4 months ago)

There are several cheap film scanners like Wolvarine Etc for $70 t0 80$ - they have a 8 to 20 Mega Pixel camera mounted on a light box with film holders for 35mm film and mounted slides. There is a 2.5Inch LCD display and provision to adjust the exposure. Free standing - can save the image in the SD card or in a PC via USB. Fast and Easy. Check up with FRYS electronics - Burbank California or Costo/ Amazon etc.
Speed and easy operation is important. For scanning few frames you as well get it done in a LB for les then a $ per frame.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Digitall
By Digitall (Jun 16, 2013)

Fail.

0 upvotes
Hibolta
By Hibolta (Jun 13, 2013)

yes, an epson V-somethng scanner 2nd hand is way better, got mine for 50 bucks.

0 upvotes
Eddaweaver
By Eddaweaver (Jun 14, 2013)

If everyone buys them second hand they'll stop making them ;) A second hand flatbed is likely to have dust or fingerprints on the glasstop.
Flatbed scanners won't manage the same resolution as a quality dedicated film scanner. The Epson V700 comes closest but the V600 is alot cheaper.

0 upvotes
RobG67
By RobG67 (Jun 13, 2013)

What about us old fossils that still shoot 120? No love for us at all. :)

(yeah, I know - 120 copied by a mobile phone camera really IS a waste of film...)

2 upvotes
vladimir vanek
By vladimir vanek (Jun 13, 2013)

So, I should take the box of my negatives, take this whatever-it-is and my superslim mobile, and go out "scanning" my negatives, right? But why, if I got the box of negatives at home, my home computer with 27-inch screen is home as well and my real scanner...guess what? Purpose of this?

Comment edited 27 seconds after posting
1 upvote
andrew hc ng
By andrew hc ng (Jun 13, 2013)

Well I mean not everyone has a film scanner at home, but really wanna scan their films? And as nowadays like everyone has a smartphone, its pretty convenient, don't you think?

0 upvotes
Eddaweaver
By Eddaweaver (Jun 14, 2013)

Convenient maybe but probably not very smart. It's very tricky to do a good job of directly photographing negatives with even a dSLR, and the sensors in mobiles are so much worse. Film degrades over time and to make any decent archival copy of their contents they need a decent film scanner, otherwise we're better off just scanning the print.

0 upvotes
EdVT
By EdVT (Jun 13, 2013)

$60- for a $6- toy that does not even scan!
there are so many better ways to do this.

1 upvote
fmian
By fmian (Jun 13, 2013)

Technically, this is not a scanner, as there is no scan head passing over the film. It's a copier, and anyone can make one out of a shoebox.
Also, there are similar cheap devices already available that use a 5mp digital camera built in, and save directly to sd card.
This product is not to be taken seriously, just like most lomo products.

3 upvotes
Nuno Souto
By Nuno Souto (Jun 12, 2013)

When will a decent scanner be made to replace Nikon's failed ones? Rather than waste time and resources with this trash!

2 upvotes
Eddaweaver
By Eddaweaver (Jun 14, 2013)

The most similar is the Plustek Opticfilm 120 scanner. There are also the Flextight scanners if you're a millionaire.

0 upvotes
PeakAction
By PeakAction (Jun 12, 2013)

I have one. It's a fun toy, but they got the orientation of the camera:film wrong. It needs to be rotated 90-degrees; as it is, the film is presented horizontally to a vertically-mounted camera.

0 upvotes
thinkfat
By thinkfat (Jun 12, 2013)

This is probably the worst way to digitize film. I just cringe by the tought of completely destroying all advantages of film by photographing it with a low quality camera and doing a botch job on the colors afterwards. But hey, it's for Lomo. I bet the hipsters will love it.

5 upvotes
groucher
By groucher (Jun 12, 2013)

And it costs nearly as much as Epson's excellent V330 scanner.

2 upvotes
fuego6
By fuego6 (Jun 12, 2013)

Meh...

1 upvote
Total comments: 16
About us
Sitemap
Connect